Evaluation of EEE 2007 Scotland – 26-30 April 2007
Using the H-form method
For
the full results of
the evaluation, click on the pdf icon to the right.
This web page is a summary and introduction to the full
results.
The organisation can be very proud of the marks that were given!
This is the score:
20 times a 10 out of 10; 16 times a 9 out of 10; 19 times an 8 out of
10; 6 times a 7 out of 10; 1 time a 6 out of 10.
This means that 62 people have given their mark and the average is an 8.8!
Collating your comments – In a small group of 6 (Johan, Valentin, Susan, Maria, Jeroen and Saskia), we have clustered all the individual comments and suggestions into larger categories. This has been done from a non-organisers point of view, meaning that we intuitively put similar comments together and gave them an overall name. The categories have been further reviewed and refined as listed below. Each category is divided into positive and negative comments and provides a range of suggestions and ideas for future conferences.
Evaluators’ personal comments on this evaluation
Maybe the organisers from this year had certain categories in mind that
would have been of special interest to you or for the following
organizing team…. But this group of helpers did not know
them. As we use the evaluation now, it is mainly meant as feedback for
this years organizing team and as input for next years. Would it be an
idea to learn from the organising experience to at least include some
evaluation criteria from the organisers point of view? (idea for next
years evaluation). We are sure you will find the comments interesting
to read anyway!
While typing up these results, we realised that the business meeting was not evaluated, while this might be useful (idea for next years evaluation). Informally we both (Jeroen and Saskia) have heard feedback on this meeting that would have been good input for improving the meeting and making it a more inclusive event for everyone. There were many newcomers this year and without the knowledge of previous conferences and the ‘spirit’ of the non-organisation that EEEurope is, the process that happens in the business meeting is not understandable. The non-EEE experienced participants did not have enough information to participate in the discussion.
We have tried to reproduce the comments as sincere as possible, although sometimes this was difficult due to the clearness of handwriting and the formatting used by those who wrote the stickies. The numbers in brackets reflect the number of comments in each area.
Saskia Szepansky and Jeroen Galama
For the full evaluation report, click the icon to the right: